Vovericz v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 185 Pa. Super. 540 - Curran v. Walter E. Knipe & Sons, Inc. · Symons v. National Electric Products, Inc. · 204 Pa. Super. 87 - Verna v. Stabler · Ball v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board · Ratchko v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Unless the board shall otherwise determine, the loss of both hands or both arms or both feet or both legs or both eyes shall constitute total disability, to be compensated according to the provisions of [Section 306(a), 77 P.S. § 511.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.