Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

41 So. 2d 317

Sorg v. Royal

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 21, 1949

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1949-06-21

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

““The law will not permit the whims and caprice of a jury, when considering factual questions, to prevail over a preponderance of the evidence as shown by the record.””

quoted by 1 later decision, including 253 So. 2d 726 - Hutto v. Washington County Kennel Club, Inc.

Relies on Allen v. Powell

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1949-06-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 1971

6 state decisions

301949195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Action by Michael M. Sorg against D.E. Royal for injuries sustained as a result of defendant's negligence. From a judgment entered on allegedly inadequate verdict in his favor, plaintiff appeals.

¶2Judgment reversed for new trial upon question of damages. On this appeal the contention is made that the jury's verdict for the plaintiff-appellant in the sum of $1,500.00 is inadequate to compensate him for permanent injuries, expenses, loss of earnings and bodily pain and suffering. The plaintiff-appellant is shown to have been a police officer when injured, earning $195.00 per month, had good health and had served as a police officer for ten years and was 70 years of age. As a result of defendant-appellant's negligence, admitted on the record, the appellant was permanently injured and lost thirteen months' time as a police officer, totalling $2,535.00. Costs of hospitalization and physician's treatment amounted to $986.17, thus the actual losses sustained as a result of the injury amounted to $3,441.17. The jury, for reasons not reflected by the record, by its verdict fixed the losses in the sum of $1,500.00. The law will not permit the whims and caprice of a jury, when considering factual questions, to prevail over a preponderance of the evidence as shown by the record. See Allen v. Powell,152 Fla. 443, 12 So.2d 378.

¶3Reversed for a new trial upon the sole question of the amount of damages. *318

¶4TERRELL, THOMAS, BARNS and HOBSON, JJ., concur.

¶5ADAMS, C.J., and SEBRING, J., dissent.

/41/so2d/317 · .json · Public domain