Broussard v. Winn’s Empirical Analysis
1949
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 1957
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Opdenwyer v. Brown · Dufrene v. Bernstein · 8 So. 2d 347 - Latiolais v. Robert · Plitt v. Plitt · 40 So. 2d 683 - Oliver v. Melancon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When two estates or lands contiguous, in cities or, in the country, have never been separated, or have never had their boundaries determined, or if the bounds, which have been formerly fixed, are no longer to be seen, each of the owners of the contiguous estates has a right to compel the other to fix the limits of their' respective properties.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lirette v. Duplantis“"The determining question therefore is whether or not the plaintiff, who has the burden of proof, adduced sufficient testimony to show that the fence has been in existence and recognized as the boundary for the stated period of time."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Beene v. Pardue
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.