Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 So. 3d 1052 - Clark v. State

41 So. 3d 1052 - Clark v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 965 So. 2d 79 - Franklin v. State · 854 So. 2d 709 - Lee v. State · 803 So. 2d 783 - Jenkins v. State · Pesci v. State · 925 So. 2d 419 - Sloss v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Hearsay evidence, including reports of a member of the multidisciplinary team or reports produced on behalf of the multidisciplinary team, is admissible in proceedings under this part unless the court finds that such evidence is not reliable. In a trial, however, hearsay evidence may not be used as the sole basis for committing a person under this part.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.