Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 SO3D 1160 - State v. Escoto

State v. Escoto’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on South Dakota v. Opperman · Colorado v. Bertine · Illinois v. Lafayette · Florida v. Wells · 426 So. 2d 148 - State v. Sims

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether the vehicle could not have remained safely where it was located; (2) whether the search was conducted in the field; (3) whether a tow truck was called before the search commenced; (4) whether formal impoundment procedures were followed; (5) whether the vehicle operator was asked if he consented to a search, if the car contained any valuables, or if he would consent to a waiver of the protections afforded by an inventory search; (6) whether the operator was given an opportunity to make arrangements for someone to pick up the vehicle for them. Escoto, supra, at 1163 (citations omitted).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.