41 So. 3d 306 - Joyner v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 39 So. 3d 252 - State v. Montgomery · 981 So. 2d 449 - Martinez v. State · 980 So. 2d 1038 - Garzon v. State · Salonko v. State · 36 So. 3d 707 - Croom v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where defense counsel agrees to a standard jury instruction and then challenges the conviction based upon fundamental error in that instruction, reversal would have the unintended consequence of encouraging defense counsel to ‘stand mute and, if necessary, agree to an erroneous instruction’ or sacrifice his client’s opportunity for a second trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sims v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.