Matfield v. State

¶1AFFIRMED. See Nash v. State, 766 So.2d 310, 310 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (affirming conviction for burglary of a vehicle with battery based on reaching into the victim’s vehicle and “intentionally touching] the victim’s closely held purse against her will” because “[b]attery is the actual and intentional touching of another person against that person’s will”); Malczewski v. State, 444 So.2d 1096, 1099 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) (holding that the word “person” in section 784.03(l)(a) “means person or anything intimately connected with the person”).