Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 So. 3d 729 - Summerall v. State

41 So. 3d 729 - Summerall v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kolender v. Lawson · 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · Posters 'N' Things, Ltd. v. United States · Jones v. State · Bordenave v. Texas & New Orleans R. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When considering a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we weigh the evidence in the light most favorable, to the verdict. ' We will not reverse a jury verdict unless convinced the circuit court abused its discretion by denying a new trial, or the final verdict results in an unconscionable injustice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.