Arthur v. Bolen’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2651
Relies on Pressley v. State · 819 So. 2d 568 - Governor Siegelman v. Alabama Assn., S. Bds. · G.E.A. v. D.B.A. · Holbrook v. Andersen Corp. · D.C.S. v. L.B.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘A trial court has broad discretion in formulating its jury instructions, provided those instructions accurately reflect the law and the facts of the case.’ Pressley v. State, 770 So.2d 115, 139 (Ala.Crim.App.1999). Thus, ‘generally-speaking, the standard of review for jury instructions is abuse of discretion.’ Pollock v. CCC Invs. I, LLC, 933 So.2d 572, 574 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2006).””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.