Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 SW2D 88 - Lassiter v. Bouche

Lassiter v. Bouche’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2006

10 state decisions

4019311940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Parker v. Schrimsher · Campbell v. Campbell · Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. Terrell · 77 Tex. Crim. 156 - Collins v. State · Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Contois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Counsel should not be permitted, by questions to a prospective juror, to commit such juror, in advance of the evidence, as to the weight he would give any certain evidence.”); Campbell, 215 S.W. 134, 137 (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas 1919, writ ref'd) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.