Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 SW3D 129 - Blue v. State

Blue v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

96
cited by 96 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

96 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Faretta v. California · Arizona v. Fulminante · Johnson v. United States · Neder v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he comments of the trial judge ... tainted appellant's presumption of innocence in front of the venire,”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If the appellate record in a criminal case reveals constitutional error that is subject to harmless error review, the court of appeals must reverse a judgment of conviction or punishment unless the court determines beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to the conviction or punishment.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “it is the province of this Court to `take notice of fundamental errors affecting substantial rights although they were not presented to the court.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.