¶1ORDER
¶2Appellant Travis Laster appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
¶3Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).