Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

41 T.C. 877

Starrett v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided March 26, 1964

United States Tax Court · decided 1964-03-26

Held, where psychoanalysis is obtained for the purpose of diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, or for the… Held: where psychoanalysis is obtained for the purpose of diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, or for the purpose of affecting any function of the body, the amount spent therefor is for medical care even though a further and additional benefit is obtained thereby such as qualification for admission to a school…

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decision will be entered for the petitioners · Decided 1964-03-26

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 2010

2 federal appellate ·

40196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Tietjens, J.,

¶1concurring: I would simply find that petitioner’s payments to the doctors were for the alleviation or cure of a mental illness and accordingly are deductible as medical expenses, and let the case end there.

Mulroney, Train, Drennen, Scott, and Dawson, JJ., agree with this concurring opinion.
/41/tc/877 · .json · Public domain