41 Va. App. 377 - Barrett (Clark) v. Com.’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2007
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Griffin v. California · Stone v. Powell · Bordenkircher v. Hayes · Blackledge v. Perry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is well established that the choice of offenses for which a criminal defendant will be charged is within the discretion of the Commonwealth's Attorney.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Barrett v. Com.“is being punished for exercising her right to appeal the first set of convictions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Barrett v. Com.“punishment to [her] for having... successfully appealed her initial charges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Barrett v. Com.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.