Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 Wash. 2d 64 - Sutton v. Mathews

41 Wash. 2d 64 - Sutton v. Mathews’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2018

7 state decisions

301952196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Simonson v. Huff · State v. Pierce · Kirsch v. Kirsch · Poropat v. Olympic Peninsula Motor Coach Co. · Olive Co. v. Meek

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An offer of proof must be sufficiently definite and comprehensive fairly to advise the trial court whether or not the proposed evidence is admissible.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.