Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 Wash. App. 113 - State v. Reynoso

41 Wash. App. 113 - State v. Reynoso’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 2021

21 state decisions

7019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cooper v. State of California · Comfort v. California · 97 Wash. 2d 92 - State v. White · 95 Wash. 2d 143 - State v. Houser · 95 Wash. 2d 170 - State v. Simpson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A motor vehicle may be lawfully impounded in certain specific circumstances: ... (2) as part of the police "community caretaking function," if the removal of the vehicle is necessary (in that it is abandoned, or impedes traffic, or poses a threat to public safety and convenience, or is itself threatened by vandalism or theft of its contents), and neither the defendant nor his spouse or friends are available to move the vehicle; and (3) as part of the police function of enforcing traffic regulations, if the driver has committed one of the traffic offenses for which the legislature has specifically authorized impoundment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “First, the language of RCW 46.20.435(1) indicates the Legislature did not intend that provision to be enforced indiscriminately without reference to the specific circumstances confronting the law enforcement officer. The use of the word "may" as compared to "shall" suggests those responsible for enforcing RCW 46.20.435(1) are expected to exercise some discretion in deciding whether to impound a vehicle.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Upon determining that a person is operating a motor vehicle without a valid driver's license in violation of RCW 46.20.021 ... a law enforcement officer may immediately impound the vehicle that the person is operating.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.