Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 Wash. App. 142 - KWIK-LOK CORPORATION v. Pulse

41 Wash. App. 142 - KWIK-LOK CORPORATION v. Pulse’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2011

9 state decisions

701985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 54 Wash. 2d 570 - Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc. · 100 Wash. 2d 275 - Chambers-Castanes v. King County · 99 Wash. 2d 280 - McGary v. Westlake Investors · 81 Wash. 2d 327 - Hinzman v. Palmanteer · Interpetrol Bermuda Limited v. Kaiser Aluminum International Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'The intent of the parties to the contract is to be gleaned from the document itself, and only if it is ambiguous is parol evidence regarding the parties' actual intent admissible.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Seattle Totems Hockey Club, Inc., Eldred W. Barnes, and Vincent H.D. Abbey v. The National Hockey League, the Vancouver Hockey Club, Ltd., Northwest Sports Enterprises, Ltd., Northwest Sports Enterprises, Ltd., Counterclaimant-Appellee v. Vincent H.D. Abbey, and Eldred W. Barnes, Counterdefendants-Appellants · Seattle Totems Hockey Club Inc Hd v. National Hockey League Northwest Sports Enterprises Ltd
  2. “`Evidence of damage is sufficient if it is the best evidence available and affords a reasonable basis for estimating the loss.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. SPRADLIN ROCK v. Public Utility Dist. No. 1 · 46 Wash. App. 417 - Harper & Associates v. Printers, Inc.
  3. “'capable of being understood in either of two or more possible senses.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Seattle Totems Hockey Club, Inc., Eldred W. Barnes, and Vincent H.D. Abbey v. The National Hockey League, the Vancouver Hockey Club, Ltd., Northwest Sports Enterprises, Ltd., Northwest Sports Enterprises, Ltd., Counterclaimant-Appellee v. Vincent H.D. Abbey, and Eldred W. Barnes, Counterdefendants-Appellants · Seattle Totems Hockey Club Inc Hd v. National Hockey League Northwest Sports Enterprises Ltd

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.