41 Wash. App. 303 - State v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2009
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Drope v. Missouri · National Labor Relations Board v. Garwin Corp. · 98 Wash. 2d 789 - State v. Crenshaw · 100 Wash. 2d 757 - State v. Davenport · 91 Wash. 2d 603 - State v. Gilcrist
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“lacks the capacity to understand the nature of the proceedings against him or her or to assist in his or her own defense as a result of mental disease or defect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Swain“a substantial likelihood that the [alleged] trial irregularity affected the jury verdict, thereby denying the defendant a fair trial,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ford
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.