41 Wash. App. 481 - State v. Perez’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 2011
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Michigan v. Long · Texas v. Brown · Sedillo v. United States · Harris v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`observation takes place from a non-intrusive vantage point. The governmental agent is either on the outside looking outside or on the outside looking inside to that which is knowingly exposed to the public.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Louthan · State v. Barnes“within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. State v. Perez, 41 Wash.App. 481, 483 , 704 P.2d 625 (1985) (citing State v. Seagull, 95 Wash.2d 898, 901-02 , 632 P.2d 44 (1981)). Under the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Louthan“An officer is not required to experience trembling fear or an overt threat as a prerequisite to reasonable action which protects his safety.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.