41 Wis. 2d 219 - State v. Bond’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 2002 · most notably 94 Wis. 2d 450 - Muller v. State (1980), 59 Wis. 2d 269 - Wilson v. State (1973)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Whitus v. State of Georgia Whitus · Cassell v. Texas · Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Wirtz · Sims v. Georgia · Jones v. Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The jury selection system contemplates the intervention of chance and requires that chance must freely operate on a truly representative cross section of the community's population. [A party] is not entitled to a perfectly apportioned representation on [the] jury of 12 but to only a fair jury from a panel selected without regard to race or other discriminatory factors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[The defendant] claims the most the state proved was homicide by misadventure. This is a legalistic way of stating the killing was an accident. Misadventure is described as an excusable homicide such as when a person unfortunately kills another in doing a lawful act without any intent to kill and without criminal negligence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Watkins“"... A defendant challenging the validity of the jury array has the burden of establishing a prima facie case of discrimination. . . .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.