41 Wis. 2d 460 - Buchanan v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Specht v. Patterson · Baxstrom v. Herold · Huebner v. State · United States of America Ex Rel. Carl G. Gerchman v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There are several germane distinctions to the classification, as seen abovethe most important is that a sexual deviate is confined because he is dangerous to the public, and the mentally ill, infirm or deficient person is confined primarily for his own benefit and treatment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“has the right to counsel, process to compel attendance of witnesses, production of evidence, [and] examination by a doctor or psychiatrist of his own choosing. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Horne““The purpose of the Sex Crimes Act is to protect the public from the commission of dangerous sex crimes and to provide treatment for the dangerous sex offender.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.