Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 WVA 19 - Haigh v. Bell

Haigh v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis

1895

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2019

11 state decisions

201895190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barbier v. Connolly · Minneapolis St Ry Co v. Beckwith · Bruetman v. Herbstein · State v. Goodwill · State v. Mines

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The propriety and necessity of a certain class of police regulations depend upon time, place, and circumstances. What is required in one district or town may not be in another.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.