In Re Riddle’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
September 2013
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 1329 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Relies on In Re Teresa Jo Hoggle · 16 1263 71813 Chaffin Chaffin · Meza v. Truman · Nowlin v. Peake · Suggs v. Stanley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.