Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 410 F.2d 1209 - Bailey v. United States

Bailey v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

410 F.2d 1209 · 1969

Citation profile

114
cited by 114 later decisions
4
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

91 federal appellate · 3 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 114 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably United States v. Cardall (1989), United States v. Petersen (1979)

91 federal appellate · 3 district · 12 state decisions

8501969197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1201 (International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act of 1993)

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Bruton v. United States · Jackson v. Denno · Opper v. United States · United States v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 114 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “are not entitled to separate trials as a matter of right.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Before we ask you any questions you must understand your rights. You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can be used against you in court. You have the right to talk to a lawyer for advice before we ask you any questions and to have him with you during questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer one will be appointed for you before any questioning, if you wish. If you decide to answer questions now without a lawyer present, you will still have the right to stop answering at any time. You also have the right to stop answering at any time until you talk to a lawyer.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “unless misconduct on the part of the prosecution can be said to have influenced the jury's verdict, reversal will not be required.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.