Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 410 F.2d 383 - United States v. Gambert

United States v. Gambert’s Empirical Analysis

410 F.2d 383 · 1969

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
November 1990
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 1990

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

1001969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2312

Relies on 9 Ill. 2d 224 - The People v. Moore · Butler v. United States · United States v. Costanzo · State v. Cortez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In arguing a close ease before the jury, it is manifestly unfair for the prosecutor to throw into the scales the weight of the judge’s influence by intimating, even mildly, that the judge thinks the defendant guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “You all are the ones to decide whether I have proved the facts under the law. But legally, I have satisfied the court that it can go to the jury for your determination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.