Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 410 F.2d 492 - Anderson v. Hershey

Anderson v. Hershey’s Empirical Analysis

410 F.2d 492 · 1969

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
October 1971
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on United States v. O'Brien · Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez · Trop v. Dulles · Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11 · Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * No judicial review shall be made of the classification or processing of any registrant by local boards, appeal boards, or the President, except as a defense to a criminal prosecution instituted under section 12 of this title [section 462 of this Appendix], after the registrant has responded either affirmatively or negatively to an order to report for induction, or for civilian work in the case of a registrant determined to be opposed to participation in war in any form: Provided, That such review shall go to the question of the jurisdiction herein reserved to local boards, appeal boards, and the President only when there is no basis in fact for the classification assigned to such registrant.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “* * * In the case of an exemption, the Congress has made the decision that qualifying persons shall be beyond the pool of manpower available for military purposes. In the case of a deferment, the Congress has tried to set priorities, to provide predictability, and to guarantee equality of treatment — but not immunity — for those within the available pool of manpower. An exempt person is predetermined to be outside the system; a deferred person is within the system. We deem this a significant line of demarcation. 3 57”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “I am of the opinion that the delinquency regulations are punitive and for this reason invalid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.