410 F.2d 752
Docket Nos. 12150, 12151.
Full caption · 2 consolidated cases
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
Argued May 6, 1969. Decided May 13, 1969.
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1969-05-13
2 counsel of record
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1969-05-13
Cited by 10 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1984
9 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
Donald J. Coureas, Norfolk, Va. (court-appointed), for appellants.
James A. Oast, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty. (C. V. Spratley, Jr., U.S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.
Before SOBELOFF, BOREMAN, and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The defendants were convicted of breaking open a mail box (18 U.S.C. 1705). Upon consideration of the briefs and oral argument, we find no error. Their convictions are affirmed.