Sharp v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
410 F.2d 969 · 1969
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently October 1984 · most notably Chapman v. United States (1977), United States v. Yeager (1973)
18 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Simmons v. United States · Schmerber v. State of California · Griffin v. California · Grunewald v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘In accord with this decision, it is not permissible to penalize an individual for exercising his Fifth Amendment privilege when he is under police custodial interrogation. The prosecution may not, therefore, use at trial the fact that he stood mute or claimed his privilege in the face of accusation.’ 384 U.S. at 468 n. 37, 86 S.Ct. at 1625 n. 37, 16 L.Ed.2d at 720 n. 37.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The principles of the Fifth Amendment as enunciated in Miranda v. Arizona, 1966, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.