Maghee v. Ault’s Empirical Analysis
410 F.3d 473 · 2005
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Lopez-Ruiz v. United States · In re Hill · Blachy v. Butcher · Paul Kreutzer v. Michael S. Bowersox, Warden, Superintendent · Hanifi Jihad v. Sheryl Ramstad Hvass, Commissioner of Corrections
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Equitable tolling is proper only when extraordinary circumstances beyond a prisoner's control make it impossible to file a petition on time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Finch v. Miller“Equitable tolling is an exceedingly narrow window of relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Finch v. Miller
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.