410 F. Supp. 1243 - Buckel v. Prentice’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 1992
4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights · Petroleo Brasileiro, SA, Petro. v. Ameropan Oil Corp. · 381 F. Supp. 363 - Watkins Motor Lines, Inc. v. Zero Refrigerated Lines
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Court, then, while in agreement with plaintiffs that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact herein, does not agree that plaintiffs are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. On the contrary, the Court concludes that on the facts present the defendants are entitled to judgment. The fact that defendants have not filed a cross-motion for summary judgment does not preclude entry of such a judgment if they are otherwise entitled thereto (citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“If plaintiffs were seeking to take issue with the content of the materials heretofore permitted to be distributed, a different case might be presented.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is insufficient to support a finding that defendants have created a public forum for the expression of ideas or the dissemination of information.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.