Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 410 N.W.2d 247 - Wright v. Scott

Wright v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 2019

2 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

701987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jallen v. Agre · Wong v. Bailey · Messer v. Washington National Insurance · Wiltgen v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. · Cunningham v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The law favors settlement of controversies. A settlement agreement is essentially contractual in nature. The typical settlement resolves uncertain claims and defenses, and the settlement obviates the necessity of further legal proceedings between the settling parties. We have long held that voluntary settlements of legal disputes should be encouraged, with the terms of settlements not inordinately scrutinized.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Courts should ... support agreements which have for their object the amicable settlement of doubtful rights by parties .... [S]uch agreements are binding without regard to which party gets the best of the bargain or whether all the gain is in fact on one side and all the sacrifice on the other.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.