Associated Press v. Bradshaw’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 2015
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pell v. Procunier · Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia · Globe Newspaper Company v. Superior Court for County of Norfolk · Press-Enterprise Company v. Superior Court of California for County of Riverside · Gannett Co Inc v. A
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Once a request for closure has been made, the [circuit] court must assure that the interests of all parties, including the ... [m]edia, the State, and the court, are protected. All parties must be afforded notice and a hearing before the [circuit] court makes a determination on the closure issue.” Id. at 579. 3 . Slota takes issue with Rolfe I’s citation to Goldberg v. United States, 425 U.S. 94, 111 , 96 S.Ct. 1338, 1348 , 47 L.Ed.2d 603 (1976). Goldberg was cited for the proposition that”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Slota“Upon the trial or hearing of cases arising under this chapter, the court shall admit the general public to the hearing room, except when the child, his parents or their attorney request that the hearing be private, and in that event the court may admit only such persons as may have a direct interest in the case, witnesses, officers of the court and news media representatives. Summons may be issued requiring the appearance of any other person whose presence the court deems necessary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“SDCL 26-8-32 reads that “the court may admit” certain categories of persons. By the language used (i.e., may) our legislature gave judges the discretion to admit one, all, or a combination of the enumerated parties to a juvenile court hearing. To hold otherwise would give the press greater rights than that of the general public. (Emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.