Stokes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2001
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Powell v. Nichols · Poafpybitty v. Skelly Oil Company · Harper v. Hildreth · Ritchie v. Kansas, Nebraska & Dakota Railway Co. · State ex rel. Heinze v. District Court of the Second Judicial District
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A new trial is a re-examination in the same court, of an issue of fact, or of law, either or both, after a verdict by a jury, the approval of the report of a referee, or a decision by the court. * *”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the duty ... to adopt that construction of the amended act 'which will best repress the evils and advance the remedy' sought to be afforded by the Legislature.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““By the terms of 12 O.S.Supp.1963, § 651, a motion for new trial became necessary and required in every case in order to preserve for review the errors in determining issues of fact and of law, whether such issues arose upon the pleadings or were raised by motion.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Evans v. Wilkinson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.