Peeples v. Page’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
April 1979
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ker v. People of the State of Illinois · Taylor v. Taintor · Newhall v. Le Breton · Bishop v. United States · Strand v. Schmittroth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““After the defendant enters his plea to the merits of the case, he is in no position to later contend that he was denied a preliminary hearing. The rule was most recently repeated in Melchor v. State, Okl.Cr., 404 P.2d 63 : ‘If defendant, upon arraignment, pleads to the merits and enters on trial, he waives right .to preliminary examination, or, if pile was held, and irregularities therein.’ “See also Blake v. State, Okl.Cir. [sic], 375 P.2d 270 ; and Muldrow v. State, 16 Okl.Cr. 549 , 185 P. 332 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jenkins v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.