Holt v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
4
states following
June 2008
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 90 Okla. Crim. 151 - Yoes v. State · Greenwood v. State · Hogan v. State · Jones v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where a defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction, and no brief in support of the petition in error is submitted, and no appearance for oral argument is made, we do not consider it the duty of this Court to go into a careful examination of the evidence to determine whether or not the trial court erred in the admission or rejection of testimony. This Court will examine the record for jurisdictional errors, and if no fundamental error appears, the judgment will be affirmed. Yoes v. State, 90 Okl.Cr. 151 , 211 P.2d 1022 , and cases cited.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Crawford v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.