State v. Storey’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
July 2023
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Griffith v. Kentucky · South Dakota v. Neville · United States v. Johnson · State v. Gomez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen there has been no search, the Supreme Court has all but said that anything short of criminalizing refusal does not impermissibly burden or penalize a defendant's Fourth Amendment right to be free from an unreasonable warrantless search. We take that short leap today and conclude that introducing evidence of [the defendant's] refusal to consent to a blood or breath test to determine his BAC did not impermissibly burden his Fourth Amendment right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that the constitutional proscription announced in Birchfield does not extend to the introduction of evidence of, or a prosecutor's comment on, such refusal to consent”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a state cannot criminally punish an individual for refusing to submit to a warrantless blood draw,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.