Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 410 Pa. Super. 284 - Commonwealth v. Grier

410 Pa. Super. 284 - Commonwealth v. Grier’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

28 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 396 Pa. Super. 92 - Commonwealth v. Thomas · 395 Pa. Super. 608 - Commonwealth v. Weinder · 334 Pa. Super. 203 - Commonwealth v. Britton · 388 Pa. Super. 469 - Commonwealth v. Dukeman · 398 Pa. Super. 94 - Commonwealth v. Wolfe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A claim for ineffectiveness may be raised in a PCRA petition if the ineffectiveness “so undermined the truth-determining process that no reliable adjudication of guilt or innocence could have taken place.” 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9543(a)(2)(h). We have interpreted this to mean that an ineffectiveness claim brought under the PCRA must raise a question of whether an “innocent individual” has been convicted. See Commonwealth v. Perlman, 392 Pa.Super. 1, 5 , 572 A.2d 2, 4 (1990) (contention of ineffectiveness for failing to preserve insufficiency of evidence issue was cognizable because it raised issue of possible innocence). We have held that the language in the PCRA referring to ineffectiveness claims constitutes “a substantial restriction of the grounds for post-conviction collateral relief in Pennsylvania.” Commonwealth v. Thomas, 396 Pa.Super. 92, 98 , 578 A.2d 422, 425 (1990) (comparing PCRA provision to broader language in predecessor Post Conviction Hearing Act).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.