Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 410 So. 2d 1070 - State v. Barrow

410 So. 2d 1070 - State v. Barrow’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably State v. Sanders (1994), 708 So. 2d 703 - State v. Williams (1998)

30 state decisions

2001982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 391 So. 2d 421 - State v. Gibson · 397 So. 2d 1258 - State v. Monroe · 377 So. 2d 308 - State v. Carthan · 304 So. 2d 300 - State v. Kaufman · State v. Hayes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Upon motion of a defendant, a mistrial shall be ordered when a remark or comment, made within the hearing of the jury by the judge, district attorney, or a court official, during the trial or in argument, refers directly or indirectly to: (1) Race, religion, color or national origin, if the remark or comment is not material and relevant and might create prejudice against the defendant in the mind of the jury; (2) Another crime committed or alleged to have been committed by the defendant as to which evidence is not admissible; (3) The failure of the defendant to testify in his own defense; or (4)The refusal of the judge to direct a verdict. An admonition to the jury to disregard the remark or comment shall not be sufficient to prevent a mistrial. If the defendant, however, requests that only an admonition be given, the court shall admonish the jury to disregard the remark or comment but shall not declare a mistrial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “A mistrial may be ordered, and in a jury case the jury dismissed, when: * * * * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.