Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 410 SO2D 157 - Antone v. State

Antone v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
January 2009
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2009

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

100198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Payton v. New York · United States v. Agurs · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Williams v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Bruns' testimony that Antone was the middleman was not new evidence; that fact had been established during the course of the original trial testimony. Antone was a middleman who organized, set up, and masterminded the actual killing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “did not have knowledge of Gilford's statement to Bruns regarding Antone's ignorance of Cloud's murder until after it occurred and his after-the-fact participation in paying the money.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The names and addresses of all persons known to the prosecutor to have information which may be relevant to the offense charged, and to any defense with respect thereto.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.