410 So. 2d 449 - Craig v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably 710 So. 2d 1276 - Williams v. State (1996), 501 So. 2d 520 - McCord v. State (1986)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co. · 44 Ala. App. 559 - Livingston v. State · Haynes v. State · 55 Ala. App. 277 - Associated Industries of Alabama, Inc. v. State · 335 So. 2d 211 - Hudson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he theft of property which exceeds $25.00 in value, and which is taken from or in a building where said property is sold or stored. . . .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A person commits the crime of theft of property if he:”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Sections 13A-8-4 (e) and 13A-8-4 (a) proscribe different conduct. Section 13A-8-4 (e), as used in this case, proscribes that conduct which is commonly known as shoplifting. It requires no recitation of authority for this court to recognize the seriousness of this widespread and costly problem. The legislature by enacting § 13A-8-4 (e) obviously intended to provide stiff penalties for those persons caught engaging in that conduct in our state. "On the other hand, § 13A-8-4 (a) proscribes that conduct which includes, but is not necessarily limited to, theft of property from a person's home or office."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Parker v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.