¶1We affirm the order revoking Webb’s probation for violating condition (5) but remand with directions to strike the finding that he also violated condition (6) because that finding does not conform with the trial court’s oral pronouncement at the revocation hearing. See Sampson v. State, 375 So.2d 325 (Fla.2d DCA 1979); Brouillett v. State, 373 So.2d 449 (Fla.2d DCA 1979).
410 So. 2d 669
Webb v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 10, 1982
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1982-03-10
Relies on 375 So. 2d 325 - Sampson v. State · Bloyd v. State
Decided 1982-03-10