410 So. 2d 741 - State v. Day’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
62 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably 870 So. 2d 995 - State v. Johnson (2004), 412 So. 2d 584 - State v. Mose (1982)
62 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 356 So. 2d 1370 - State v. Martin · 359 So. 2d 965 - State v. Nicholas · 356 So. 2d 1376 - State v. Tillman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“possession a necessary element of the offense or specifically require that the defendant have the firearm on his person to be in violation.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(I)t is unlawful for any person who has been convicted of ... first degree, or simple robbery, ... to possess a firearm or carry a concealed weapon”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A. It is unlawful for any person who has been convicted of a crime of violence as defined in R.S. 14:2(13) which is a felony ... or any crime defined as an attempt to commit one of the above enumerated offenses under the laws of this state, or who has been convicted under the laws of any other state or of the United States or of any foreign government or country of a crime which, if committed in this state, would be one of the above enumerated crimes, to possess a firearm or carry a concealed weapon.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Donald
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.