Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 410 SW3D 204 - State v. Jackson

State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Batson v. Kentucky · Purkett v. Elem · State v. Forrest · State v. Berry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “examination, which included the collection of samples for use in DNA analysis. In several cases, additional DNA evidence, fingerprints, and hair samples were recovered from the scene of the crimes. The crimes remained unsolved for more than twenty-five years. In 2010, a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In other words, one cannot be punished for the same offense twice, though there can be several offenses within the same conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In determining double jeopardy, Missouri follows the separate or several offense rule rather than the same transaction rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.