Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 411 F.2d 1196 - Phinney v. Mauk

Phinney v. Mauk’s Empirical Analysis

411 F.2d 1196 · 1969

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
July 1992
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently July 1992 · most notably Hoeme v. Commissioner (1974), Wright v. Commissioner (1974)

7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

1501969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 215

Relies on Taylor v. Campbell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “imposed on or incurred by the husband under the decree or under a written instrument incident to such divorce or separation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “indelibly stamp such payments as being made pursuant to a property settlement agreement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “because of the marital or family relationship”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.