Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 411 F.2d 1374 - Galewitz v. Commissioner

Galewitz v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
May 1998
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 1998

9 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

801969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 212

Relies on Newman v. Dore · Hochschild v. Commissioner · Safety Tube Corp. v. Commissioner · Larchfield Corp. v. United States · 135 F. Supp. 233 - Sergievsky v. McNamara

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Obviously, in every case a taxpayer who succeeds in retaining his property against an unjustified attack “conserves” it in a certain sense. But “conservation” must have a narrower meaning than this. The statute and the regulation exist side-by-side and it would make no sense to say that every case which falls within the regulation also comes within the statute.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In the case of an individual, there shall be allowed as a deduction all the ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year— ****** (2) for the management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for the production of income; . . . . ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.