Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 411 F.2d 537 - Maurice M. Wills and Gertrude E. Wills v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Maurice M. Wills and Gertrude E. Wills v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

108
cited by 108 later decisions
1
states following
February 2002
most recently cited

36 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 108 later decisions — most recently February 2002 · most notably Mitchell v. Commissioner (1980), Rosenspan v. United States (1971)

36 federal appellate · 1 district ·

55019691970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Duberstein D Stanton · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. South Texas Lumber Co · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Flowers · United States v. Correll · Bingler v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 108 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * if there is a reasonable probability known to [the taxpayer] that he may be employed for a long period of time at his new station. What contitutes 'a long period of time' varies with circumstances surrounding each case.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “has been said to connote activities of an aesthetic nature, including, for example, painting, drawing, architecture, sculpture, poetry, music, dancing and dramatics. Wills v. C.I.R . (1969), 411 F.2d 537 , 542 (C.A. Wash.). See also Design, Incorporated v. Emerson Company (1970), 319 F. Supp. 8 , 10 (D.C. Tex.). Finally, if that portion of sec. 59.07 (95), Stats., which authorizes appropriations for”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. (1972)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.