Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 411 F.2d 705 - Washington v. Cameron

Washington v. Cameron’s Empirical Analysis

411 F.2d 705 · 1969

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
5
states following
October 2006
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently October 2006 · most notably DeCintio v. Westchester County Medical Center (1987), Illinois State Employees Union, Council 34, American Federation Of State, County And Municipal Employees, Afl-Cio, Et Al. v. John W. Lewis (1973)

22 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions

17019691970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp. · Blackmar v. Guerre · Kennedy v. Powell · Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners of New Jersey · Wittlin v. Giacalone

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This holding in no way supports the view that a mere request for answers to interrogatories will operate to bar the trial court from acting on a motion for summary judgment. It is incumbent upon the party seeking answers to demonstrate that his inquiry is directed toward establishing the 'material facts' and that upon receipt of those answers he will be armed to defend against that motion. This holding does not support harassment tactics or requests for information that is equally accessible to both parties. We simply decide this case on its facts as applied to our reading of Rule 56(c).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It seems clear that this case must be remanded in order to accord appellant a fair hearing developed by discovery on the issue of emergency.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.