Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

411 F.2d 990

Docket No. 22917.

Walter Lee Ervin v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Warden

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1969-05-02

2 counsel of record

Relies on State v. Ervin

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1969-05-02

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 1992

11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

801969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Evelyn N. Scott (argued), Salem, Or., for appellant.

David H. Blunt (argued), Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert Y. Thornton, Atty. Gen., Salem, Or., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and BEEKS, District Judge.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The appeal is dismissed.

¶2

This case began with a state conviction. It was affirmed on appeal. State v. Ervin, 241 Or. 475, 406 P.2d 901 (1965).

¶3

Next Ervin files in federal district court asserting many points never submitted at any time.

¶4

Oregon has post-conviction remedies, but no attempt has been made to use them.

¶5

Duty requires us to interfere with state process from time to time, but in this case obviously not yet.

/411/f2d/990 · .json · Public domain