Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 411 F.3d 231 - Hansson v. Norton

Hansson v. Norton’s Empirical Analysis

411 F.3d 231 · 2005

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
October 2018
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 23 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Buckhannon Board and Care Home Incs v. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources · Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp. · New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. Carey · Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This court generally treats settlement agreements as contracts subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “in writing within thirty (30) calendar days of the date [Greenhill] knew or should have known of the alleged noncompliance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.