Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 411 F.3d 452 - Joubert v. ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc.

Joubert v. ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

411 F.3d 452 · 2005

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Alexander v. Sandoval · Cheryl Bessette for Herself and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Avco Financial Services Inc · Donna Marie Walls, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. · Pertuso v. Ford Motor Credit Co. · In Re: Continental Airlines

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While it is true that the considerable discretion conferred on courts sitting in bankruptcy by § 105 is not unlimited, in that it is not a ‘roving commission to do equity,’ ... a court is well within its authority if it exercises its equitable powers to enforce a specific code provision ... Thus, § 105 does not itself create a private right of action, but a court may invoke § 105 ‘if the equitable remedy utilized is demonstrably necessary to preserve a right elsewhere provided in the Code.’ (citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Like substantive federal law itself, private rights of action to enforce federal law must be created by Congress, Statutory intent on this latter point is determinative. Without it, a cause of action does not exist and courts may not create one, no matter how desirable that might be as a policy matter, or how compatible with the statute. ‘Raising up causes of action where a statute has not created them may be a proper function for common-law courts, but not for federal tribunals.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “To the extent that an allowed secured claim is secured by property the value of which ... is greater than the amount of such claim, there shall be allowed to the holder of such claim, interest on such claim, and any reasonable fees, costs, or charges provided for under the agreement or State statute under which such claim arose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.